Legal Opinion

McLean v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 2, 1999No. 98-858PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant argues that failure to announce imposition of restitution at sentencing or give appellant notice of the intent to impose restitution and the right to have a hearing thereon was reversible error. This issue was not, however, preserved for appeal. Locke v. State, 719 So.2d 1249 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998); Lorenzana v. State, 717 So.2d 119 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998). The remaining issues raised on appeal are without merit.

AFFIRMED.

BARFIELD, C.J., BOOTH and WOLF, JJ., CONCUR.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Locke v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
  2. Lorenzana v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Maddox v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2000
  2. Maddox v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2000
  3. McLean v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2000