Legal Opinion

Rosenkrantz v. Hall

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 26, 1965No. 64-599PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

This is the second appearance of this cause before us. The facts are adequately set forth in Rosenkrantz v. Hall, Fla.App.1964, 161 So.2d 673.

Upon the remand of the cause pursuant to the above opinion, the trial judge entered an amended final judgment which is now appealed by Rosenkrantz who was also the appellant on the first appeal. It is urged that the trial judge erred in discharging the lien of the appellant against the funds held by the appellee; and second, it is urged that the trial judge abused his discretion in setting the legal fee of the appellant Joseph Rosenkrantz.

In considering…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. South Florida Lumber & Supply Co. v. ReadSupreme Court of Florida · 1913
  2. Webb Fur. Co. Inc. v. EverettSupreme Court of Florida · 1932
  3. Marshall & Spencer Co. v. Peoples BankSupreme Court of Florida · 1924
  4. Rosenkrantz v. HallDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1964

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Alford v. SummerlinDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
  2. TRW AUTOMOTIVE US LLC v. PapandopolesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007
  3. Conlee Constr. Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1970
  4. Westinghouse Electric Supply Co. v. Diplomat Electric, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1969
  5. Reese v. BaronDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1971

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API