Greenwood v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partBaird, Judge
I agree that Tex.R.App.P. 53(d) requires the defendant to provide either an agreed statement of facts or a statement of facts which contains the entire record of the trial before the fact finder, in order to challenge the sufficiency of the evidence.1 The majority’s interpretation of the interplay between Tex.R.App.P. 50(d) and Rule 53(d) is consistent with my position in Stacy v. State, 819 S.W.2d 860, 864 (Tex.Cr.App.1991) (Baird, J., dissenting) (“[a] party should not be able to prevail on appeal by failing to discharge its burden of providing the appellate court with a sufficient…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Stacy v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
- Greenwood v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1991
- State v. Stacy, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1990
- State v. DanielsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991