Legal Opinion

Earl Kill Smith v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided March 3, 1958No. 7464_1PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an appeal from denial of a motion, made under Rule 35 of the Rules of Criminal Procedure, 18 U.S.C., to- correct the sentence in a criminal case. Appellant pleaded guilty to, an indictment charging bank robbery and that in perpetrating the robbery he put in. jeopardy the lives of named persons “by the use of a dangerous weapon”. He was-sentenced to a term of twenty-five years, imprisonment and to pay a fine of $10,-000. He complains of this sentence on the ground that the “dangerous” weapon was not more specifically described in the indictment. The point is without merit for reasons…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States v. McGannDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1957

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. Joseph Givens, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  2. Glendel D. Wheeler v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1963
  3. United States v. George Ershin Poindexter, United States of America v. Fay Albert Carrell, United States of America v. Melvin Glen MartinCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1961
  4. United States v. McGannDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API