Legal Opinion

New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad v. Stevens

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided June 11, 1908PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Application to the Ron. Alberto T. Roraback, a judge of the Superior Court, for the appointment of appraisers to estimate the compensation to he paid to the defendant for land taken for the uses of a street railway. A motion to dismiss the application, and then a demurrer to it, having been successively filed and overruled, the case was heard on the merits, and a judgment rendered appointing appraisers, from which this appeal was taken.

1Opinion of the CourtBaldwin, C. J.

The Woodbury and Waterbury Street Railway Company was incorporated in 1903, with power “ to locate, construct, and finally complete a street railway upon” a route particularly described in the charter, and further “ to construct, maintain, and operate a line of railway upon any private property which it has or may acquire near to the route mentioned herein.” The route described was in part from a point “ about one thousand feet southerly from the dam at Quassapaug pond,” in the highway leading from Woodbury through Middlebury to Southbury, “ Northerly along said highway to the southerly end…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Stafford Springs Street Railway Co. v. Middle River Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1907

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. King v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  2. Donohue v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1967
  3. Norton v. Shore Line Electric Railway Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1911
  4. Muller v. Town Plan & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1958
  5. Stamford Ridgeway Associates v. Board of RepresentativesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API