Legal Opinion
Finnsugar Bioproducts, Inc. v. Amalgamated Sugar Co.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided October 10, 2002No. 97 C 8746PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
ST. EVE, District Judge.
Plaintiff Finnsugar Bioproducts, Inc. has filed a Renewed Motion for Reconsideration of the Court’s March 25, 2002 order finding Plaintiffs patent invalid under the “on sale” bar of the Patent Act, 35 U.S.C. § 102(b). Defendants The Amalgamated Sugar Co., LLC and ARI have filed a Motion to Strike Plaintiffs (Third) Motion for Reconsideration. Plaintiff then filed a Motion to Strike Defendants’ Motion to Strike, and the Court denied that motion on October 7, 2002. For the reasons set forth below, Plaintiffs Renewed Motion for Reconsideration…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Caisse Nationale De Credit Agricole, a French Banking Corporation v. Cbi Industries, Incorporated, a Delaware Corporation, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
- Bank of Waunakee, a Wisconsin Banking Corporation v. Rochester Cheese Sales, Inc., a Minnesota CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
- Pfaff v. Wells Electronics, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Genentech, Inc. v. Novo Nordisk, A/s, Novo Nordisk of North America, Inc. And Novo Nordisk Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
- Publishers Resource, Inc. v. Walker-Davis Publications, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Caine v. BurgeDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2012
- Lockhart v. HSBC Finance CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2020