Legal Opinion

Wells v. City Railway Co.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided January 25, 1938No. 1477Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By HORNBECK, J.

This is an appeal on questions of law from a judgment in the sum of $5,000.00 for plaintiff, entered on a special verdict in bis behalf.

The brief of defendant sets forth and discusses five assignments of error, as follows:

*208“First: Error in the General Charge on Instructing the jury that ;hey must Assess Dammages.
“Second: Error in 'he Special Verdict.
“Third: Error in the Exclusion of Evidence.
“Fourth: The verdict is Manifestly against the Weight of the Evidence.
“Fifth: The verdict is Excessive, Appearing to have been Rendered Under the Influence of Passion and Prejudice.”

FI…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Martz v. Floral Products Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API