Eckman v. Lindbeck
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal by the plaintiff, John W. Eckman, from, an order of the Supreme Court, made at the Erie Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Chautauqua on the 9th day of April, 1917," limiting an order previously obtained by him for the examination of the individual defendants before trial.
1Opinion of the Court
De Angelis, J.:
The action is claimed to be a representative action brought by a stockholder against a corporation and its directors under sections 90 and 308 of the General Corporation Law (Consol. Laws, chap. 23; Laws of 1909, chap. 28) to compel the directors to account for moneys diverted by them from the corporation.
The Vinculo Realty Company is a foreign corporation, organized under the laws of the State of Delaware, and owns a large tract of land in the island of Cuba.
*721The Vinculo Sugar Cane Company, the defendant corporation, is also a foreign corporation, organized under the laws of…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Sage v. . CulverNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
- Seagrist v. ReidAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916
3Cited by5 opinions
- Green v. SelznickAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1927
- Judd v. Park Avenue HospitalNew York Supreme Court · 1962
- Behl v. GreenbaumAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1918
- Burgess v. StevensNew York Supreme Court · 1933
- Burns v. HayesNew York Supreme Court · 1948