Legal Opinion

Emigh Engineering Co., Inc. v. Rickhoff

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided August 19, 1980No. 41943PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEWART, Presiding Judge.

This a proceeding in prohibition. We issued our preliminary writ of prohibition requiring the Respondent Judge to show cause why he should not be prohibited from proceeding in the cause of Sam Bournstein et al. v. Emigh Engineering Company, Inc. et al. We now make our rule peremptory.

The plaintiffs in the underlying action filed suit against defendants for damages. After a number of settings the cause was assigned to respondent’s court for trial on July 23, 1979. There is some dispute as to facts that are not essential to our determination of this cause. The fact…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Garrison v. JonesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1977

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Fisher v. McKenzieSupreme Court of Missouri · 1988
  2. Samland v. J. White Transportation Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. Fisher v. Spray Planes, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1991
  4. Malone v. Schapun, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1998
  5. Richter v. Union Pacific RailroadMissouri Court of Appeals · 2008

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API