Legal Opinion
Herron v. City of Chicago
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided September 6, 1984No. 83 C 4259PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
BUA, District Judge.
The instant case is before the Court on a petition for a Rule to Show Cause why the defendants should not be held in contempt of the 1972 consent decree entered in Shakman v. Democratic Organization of Cook County, No. 69 C 2145, reprinted in Shakman v. Democratic Organization of Cook County, 481 F.Supp. 1315, 1356 app. (N.D.Ill.1979). Before the Court is the defendants’ Motion to Dismiss the plaintiffs’ Second Amended Complaint. For the reasons stated herein, defendants’ motion is granted in part and denied in part.
The instant ease was originally filed on June 22,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States Ex Rel. Arant v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Goodman v. McDonnell Douglas Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1979
- Shakman v. Democratic Organization of Cook Cty.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1979
- Baker Manufacturing Company v. Whitewater Manufacturing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1970
- Gary A. Lingenfelter v. Keystone Consolidated Industries, Inc., a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Cygnar v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
- Harold Smith v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
- Greene v. Cook County Sheriff's OfficeDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2015
- Herron v. City of ChicagoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1985
- Cygnar v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989