Legal Opinion

Cambridge Land Co. v. Township of Marshall

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 9, 1989No. 2426 C.D.1988PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CRAIG, Judge.

This is an appeal by landowners Cambridge Land Company and Herbert Brothers from a decision of the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County, in which the court affirmed the Marshall Township Board of Supervisors’ rejection of the landowners’ curative amendment proceeding, which charged that the present zoning ordinance is invalid because it is exclusionary.

From the board’s findings, we take the following facts. The landowners together own a 40-acre tract of land located at Route 910 and Wexford Run Road in Marshall Township. Cambridge Land Company owns 13 acres of the land, and…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Concord Township AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  2. Surrick v. ZHB OF U. PROVIDENCE TP.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  3. Sullivan v. Board of SupervisorsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  4. Hammermill Paper Co. v. Greene TownshipCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  5. Marinari v. Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. East Marlborough Township v. JensenCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  2. Bloomsburg Town Center, LLC v. Town of BloomsburgCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
  3. Bloomsburg Town Center, LLC v. Town of BloomsburgCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2024
  4. D.K. Cook v. Riegelsville Borough Council and The Borough of RiegelsvilleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  5. L. Shortt and S. Shortt v. East Marlborough Twp. ZHBCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API