Legal Opinion
Duke Fredrick Cranford v. Salvador Godinez
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 2, 1993No. 92-16120Unpublished
1Opinion of the Court
996 F.2d 1224
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
Duke Fredrick CRANFORD, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
Salvador GODINEZ, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 92-16120.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted June 21, 1993.*
Decided July 2, 1993.
Before: CANBY, FERNANDEZ, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges.
2Cases cited6 opinions
- McCleskey v. ZantSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Gary R. Eitel v. William D. McCoolCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Sawyer v. WhitleySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Kuhlmann v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Burt v. HennesseyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.