Legal Opinion

Crosby v. Greenwood Motor Lines Inc

District Court, E.D. Arkansas

Decided September 30, 2025No. 4:22-cv-00557Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS CENTRAL DIVISION DAVID CROSBY, et al. PLAINTIFFS v. Case No. 4:22-cv-00557-KGB GREENWOOD MOTOR LINES, INC. d/b/a R+L CARRIERS, et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER Before the Court are Malcolm Phinney’s appeal and objections to United States Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray’s findings and rulings (Dkt. No. 302), Mr. Phinney’s motion to withdraw motions (Dkt. No. 304), and defendants Greenwood Motor Lines, Inc. d/b/a R+L Carriers (hereinafter “Greenwood”) and Matthew Dakus’s (collectively “Defendants”) motion for sanctions (Dkt. No. 310). The…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Nixon v. Warner Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Seattle Times Co. v. RhinehartSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Lisdahl v. Mayo FoundationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API