Legal Opinion

Bloodworth v. Bloodworth

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided October 10, 1968No. 24789PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Duckworth, Chief Justice.

Having closely examined the relevant facts in this case we find nothing that would cause Code § 38-117 to have any application, and to clear the ground we, at the outset, put aside that section and the numerous cases decided thereunder as being unrelated to the case made by the averments of fact in this case. Here, we have no disputed papers, no questions as to title of the testator, and no adverse claim to any of the estate. The case is in equity, and equity will never interfere with an honest fulfillment of an obligation .which transgresses no law. By the articles…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Morehead v. HarrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  2. Sessions v. Payne & TyeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
  3. Georgia Bank & Trust Co. v. HadaritsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1965
  4. Goldin v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1951
  5. Anderson v. MillerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1956

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bloodworth v. BloodworthSupreme Court of Georgia · 1969
  2. Bloodworth v. BloodworthSupreme Court of Georgia · 1970
  3. In the Matter of ThomasSupreme Court of Delaware · 1973
  4. Matter of Estate of DillonCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1978
  5. Bowen v. BuddCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API