Rowland v. Bell
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Certiorari; from Fulton superior court—Judge Bell. September 19, 1912.
1Opinion of the CourtHei, C. J.
1. Nothing is better settled than the principle that unless the judgment rendered in the lower court is absolutely demanded by the evidence, the first grant of a new trial on certiorari, in the absence of any controlling question of law, will not be disturbed. Fair v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co., 2 Ga. App. 376 (58 S. E. 492); Freeman v. Maxwell, 10 Ga. App. 316 (73 S. E. 349); Cochran v. Minter, 10 Ga. App. 377 (73 S. E. 551).
2. In the present case the jury in the justice’s court found a verdict generally for the defendant, when the undisputed evidence showed that the plaintiff was entitled…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Fair v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
- Cochran v. MinterCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1912
- Freeman v. Maxwell Furniture Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1912
3Cited by1 opinion
- Tomberlin v. BarberCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1919