Legal Opinion

Guillot v. Moore

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided March 10, 1961No. 9431PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HARDY, Judge.

This is a suit by plaintiff contractor for the recovery of judgment for the contract price and extras in the total 'amount of $8,456.19 incurred in the erection of a residence for the defendants, husband and wife. The defendants generally denied plaintiff’s claims, specifically averred that the construction was faulty, unsatisfactory,, incomplete, unfit for use, and prayed, first, for the rejection of plaintiff’s demands, and, alternatively, for judgment in reconvention, or as an offset, to the extent of alleged damages in the amount of $5,000.

From a judgment in favor of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Peterson v. PeraltaLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1926
  2. Hunter v. MayfieldLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1958
  3. Davidson v. McGrathLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1926
  4. Sarrazin v. Alfred A. Adams & Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1902
  5. Chatelaine v. Globe Construction Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1956

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Town of Winnsboro v. Barnard & Burk, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1974
  2. National Tea Co. v. Plymouth Rubber Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1995
  3. Moore v. GuillotLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API