Legal Opinion
State of New Jersey v. Acosta
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided January 11, 2021No. Civil Action No. 2019-0621Published
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA PUBLIC CITIZEN HEALTH RESEARCH GROUP et al., Plaintiffs, Civil Action No. 19-166 (TJK) v. PATRICK PIZZELLA1 et al., Defendants. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al., Plaintiffs, v. Civil Action Nos. 19-621 (TJK) PATRICK PIZZELLA et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION To improve the collection of work-related injury data, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, a component of the Department of Labor, requires qualifying employers to record work-related injuries and illnesses on three standardized forms. At first, OSHA only occasionally…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Consolo v. Federal Maritime CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Bowman Transportation, Inc. v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.