Legal Opinion

Zambrano v. Immigration And Naturalization Service

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 7, 2002No. 00-16191PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

282 F.3d 1145

Marta ZAMBRANO; Margarita Rodriguez; Graciela Lopez; Andrea Ruiz; Martha OZUNA; Jorge Perdoma, Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v.

IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE; Edwin Meese; Alan Nelson, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 00-16191.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted December 7, 2001.

Filed March 7, 2002.

Richard M. Pearl, Berkeley, CA, for appellants.

William J. Howard and Antony W. Norwood, Office of Immigration Litigation, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Plaut v. Spendthrift Farm, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. Reno v. Catholic Social Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. National Labor Relations Board v. Catholic BishopSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. United States v. Sioux Nation of IndiansSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Branson v. NottCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Westaff (USA) Inc. v. ArceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  2. Westaff USA) Inc. v. ArceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  3. United States v. Zlatko HristovCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  4. Fischel v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  5. SKAANING v. SorensenDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2010

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API