Legal Opinion

Baker v. Holland

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided June 10, 1940No. Record No. 2241PublishedCited by 3 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the CourtGregory, J.

The plaintiff in error, who was the plaintiff below, served notice upon her committee, Hugh L. Holland, that she would upon a certain day move the court to terminate his authority as committee and to require an accounting of funds due her, because she had been discharged from the Central State Hospital, to which she had previously been committed as a feeble-minded person. She later filed an amended notice in which she charged that she had been unlawfully adjudged and committed as a feeble-minded person, in that the mandatory provisions of certain statutes had not been complied with, and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States Veterans' Bureau v. ThomasSupreme Court of Virginia · 1931
  2. Shands v. ShandsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1940
  3. Mallory v. Virginia Colony for Feeble-MindedSupreme Court of Virginia · 1918

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Schmidt v. GoddinSupreme Court of Virginia · 1982
  2. Moore v. ColemanWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1945
  3. In re Guardianship Petition for WrightFairfax County Circuit Court · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API