AAA Mine Services v. Wooten
Kentucky Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
This appeal concerns whether claimant demonstrated a sufficient progression of coal workers’ pneumoconiosis to prevail on a mo*441tion to reopen a retraining incentive benefit (RIB) award which was the product of a settlement. KRS 342.125(2)(a).
An agreement between claimant and the employer, which was approved on December 12, 1991, provided that claimant would receive a lump sum of $17,500.00 in settlement of a RIB claim. Contemporaneous x-ray evidence from Drs. Anderson, Lane, Harrison, and Myers indicated that claimant suffered from category 1/0 coal workers’ pneumoconi-osis.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Beale v. Faultless HardwareKentucky Supreme Court · 1992
3Cited by7 opinions
- Crawford & Co. v. WrightKentucky Supreme Court · 2009
- Dingo Coal Co., Inc. v. TolliverKentucky Supreme Court · 2004
- Whittaker v. HurstKentucky Supreme Court · 2001
- Big Elk Creek Coal Company v. MillerKentucky Supreme Court · 2001
- Kuhlman Electric Corp v. Rex CuniganKentucky Supreme Court · 2014
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.