Rachel H. v. Department of Education
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FISHER, Circuit Judge:
Rachel H.’s parents brought suit on her behalf against the Hawaii Department of Education, alleging she was denied a free appropriate public education under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). This alleged denial did not stem from any substantive failure to include any particular special education service in her individualized education program. Rather, Rachel’s parents argued their daughter was denied a free appropriate public education because of a purported procedural error, specifically, not identifying the anticipated school where special…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Board of Education of the Hendrick Hudson Central School District v. Rowley Ex Rel. RowleySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Honig v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- T.Y. Ex Rel. T.Y. v. New York City Department of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
- White Ex Rel. White v. Ascension Parish School BoardCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2003
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- A.S., by and through his Guardian Ad Litem, ASHLEY SANCHEZ v. LONG BEACH UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICTDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2026
- B.W. v. Denver County School District No. 1District Court, D. Colorado · 2019
- J.M. v. Miller Creek School DistrictDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2023
- K.B. v. Department of Education, State of Hawai'iDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2021
- Mandeville v. Department of Education, State of HawaiiDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2022
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.