Legal Opinion

Mallow v. Hall

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided November 9, 1932PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRosenberry, C. J.

Upon the opening of the trial, O. S. Mallow, one of the plaintiffs, was sworn as a witness. He testified to the making of the contract and the delivery and *429installation of the apparatus. Upon cross-examination counsel for the defendants asked the following question:

“Do you recall, Mr. Mallow, that Mr. and Mrs. Hall were particularly anxious if they purchased an oil burner to get a quiet one ?”

To which counsel for plaintiffs objected:

“If the court please, I think we may as well settle now that any and all conversations held contemporaneous or antecedent to the signed agreements are…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Fox v. BoldtWisconsin Supreme Court · 1920
  2. J. L. Owens Co. v. WhitcombWisconsin Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Clifford v. StewartSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
  4. Mandelker v. GoldsmithWisconsin Supreme Court · 1922

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Dairyland Equipment Leasing, Inc. v. BohenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Estate of Leedom v. LeedomWisconsin Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Dunck Tank Works, Inc. v. SutherlandWisconsin Supreme Court · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API