Legal Opinion
Mallow v. Hall
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided November 9, 1932PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRosenberry, C. J.
Upon the opening of the trial, O. S. Mallow, one of the plaintiffs, was sworn as a witness. He testified to the making of the contract and the delivery and *429installation of the apparatus. Upon cross-examination counsel for the defendants asked the following question:
“Do you recall, Mr. Mallow, that Mr. and Mrs. Hall were particularly anxious if they purchased an oil burner to get a quiet one ?”
To which counsel for plaintiffs objected:
“If the court please, I think we may as well settle now that any and all conversations held contemporaneous or antecedent to the signed agreements are…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Fox v. BoldtWisconsin Supreme Court · 1920
- J. L. Owens Co. v. WhitcombWisconsin Supreme Court · 1917
- Clifford v. StewartSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
- Mandelker v. GoldsmithWisconsin Supreme Court · 1922
3Cited by3 opinions
- Dairyland Equipment Leasing, Inc. v. BohenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
- Estate of Leedom v. LeedomWisconsin Supreme Court · 1935
- Dunck Tank Works, Inc. v. SutherlandWisconsin Supreme Court · 1940