Legal Opinion

Jackson ex dem. Starr v. Richmond

New York Supreme Court

Decided August 15, 1809PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

The general rule is, that a person ought not to be made lessor, who has no claim or pretension to a subsisting title or interest in the premises. If any person, v.ho may have once had a title, is to be made lessor, the burthen of deducing a title from him, is taken iron the plaintiff, and thrown on the tenant, which *484would be unreasonable. Potior est tonditio possidentis. If there is a case that ought to be excepted from the general rule, it ought to be clearly and specially stated to the court. The motion must be denied.

Rule refused.

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bogart v. M'DonaldNew York Supreme Court · 1801
  2. Jackson ex dem. Abby v. SmithNew York Supreme Court · 1826
  3. Jackson ex dem. Harris v. MurrayNew York Supreme Court · 1823
  4. Doe ex dem. McConnel v. JohnsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1840
  5. Society for the Propagation of the Gospel v. HartlandU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania · 1874