Legal Opinion

Jorgenson v. City of Sparta

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 9, 1937PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFaiRchild, J.

At the time of the collision the city of Sparta required each policeman to furnish his own automobile for such use in the discharge of his duties as the department might require. In fixing the salary of the officer the use of the automobile furnished by him was taken into consideration. The issue is governed by sec. 66.095, Stats. That section provides for the recovery of damages proximately resulting from the negligent operation of a motor vehicle “owned and operated” by any city. The position of plaintiff is that although the motor vehicle in question was not owned by the city, still,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hayes v. City of OshkoshWisconsin Supreme Court · 1873
  2. Folk v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Singer v. TikalskyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Gilbert v. DutruitWisconsin Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Engel v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1914

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Manor v. HansonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Zinke v. Milwaukee Transport Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1980
  3. Brennan v. Employment Relations CommissionCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1983
  4. Barth v. Village of ShorewoodWisconsin Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Manor v. HansonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API