Legal Opinion
Alkholi v. MacKlowe
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided May 3, 2021No. 20-1961-cvUnpublished
1Opinion of the Court
20-1961-cv Alkholi v. Macklowe UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT SUMMARY ORDER RULINGS BY SUMMARY ORDER DO NOT HAVE PRECEDENTIAL EFFECT. CITATION TO A SUMMARY ORDER FILED ON OR AFTER JANUARY 1, 2007, IS PERMITTED AND IS GOVERNED BY FEDERAL RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 32.1 AND THIS COURT'S LOCAL RULE 32.1.1. WHEN CITING A SUMMARY ORDER IN A DOCUMENT FILED WITH THIS COURT, A PARTY MUST CITE EITHER THE FEDERAL APPENDIX OR AN ELECTRONIC DATABASE (WITH THE NOTATION "SUMMARY ORDER"). A PARTY CITING A SUMMARY ORDER MUST SERVE A COPY OF IT ON ANY PARTY NOT REPRESENTED BY COUNSEL.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Fujitsu Limited v. Federal Express CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- Georgia Malone & Co. v. RiederNew York Court of Appeals · 2012
- Crabtree v. Elizabeth Arden Sales Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1953
- Dane v. UnitedHealthcare Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2020
- Cortlandt St. Recovery Corp. v. BondermanCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 2018
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.