Legal Opinion

Duke v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided June 14, 1933No. 15851Published

1Opinion

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING.

HAWKINS, Judge.

The state, through the criminal district attorney of Gregg county, has filed a motion for rehearing, the sole ground of which is thus stated, “Because the court erred in holding that the evidence in this cause was insufficient to sustain a conviction.” Under previous holdings the motion appears to be entirely too general to call for consideration. See Singleton v. State, 20 S. W. (2d) 782; Cooper v. State, 98 Texas Crim. Rep., 446, 265 S. W., 894; Jordan v. State, 64 Texas Crim. Rep., 187, 141 S. W., 786. In our original opinion it was undertaken to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Jordan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1911
  2. Cooper v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1924
  3. Singleton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API