Legal Opinion

Wood v. Luttrel

Court of Appeals of Virginia

Decided May 10, 1798PublishedCited by 8 opinions

In an action upon the case, brought by Wood against the executors of Carr, the declaration contained two counts : 1st. Indebitatus assumspsit for 50/. sterling, of the value of 50/. current money, for so much money paid by the plaintiff to the defendant’s testator, at his special instance and request; 2d. For money had and received to the plaintiff’s use. Plea, non assumpsit, and issue.

Read the full summary

In an action upon the case, brought by Wood against the executors of Carr, the declaration contained two counts : 1st. Indebitatus assumspsit for 50/. sterling, of the value of 50/. current money, for so much money paid by the plaintiff to the defendant’s testator, at his special instance and request; 2d. For money had and received to the plaintiff’s use. Plea, non assumpsit, and issue. Verdict for 103/. 12s. 3c?., “subject to the opinion of the Court, whether the bill of .exchange and protest, and the letters of 'Carr to Wood, hereto annexed, be legal evidence, admissible to the jury, in…

1Opinion of the Court

ROANE, Judge.

This is an action of assumpsit, and the declaration contains two counts; one for money paid *206by the plaintiff to the defendant’s testator, at his special instance and request; and, the other for money had and received by the testator, to the use of the plaintiff. The pjea js non assumpsit, on which the plaintiff took issue, and the jury have found a verdict for the plaintiff for 103/. 12s. 3d. currency, subject to the opinion of the Court, upon this question, “ whether the bill of exchange and protest, and the letters of TV. Carr hereto annexed, be legal evidence admissible to the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Pacific Cable Construction Co. v. McNattWashington Supreme Court · 1891

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Billgerry v. Branch & SonsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1869
  2. Billgerry v. Branch & Sons.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1869
  3. Riddle v. MandevilleU.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia · 1802
  4. Archer v. WardSupreme Court of Virginia · 1853
  5. Bank of the U. States v. Jackson's adm'xSupreme Court of Virginia · 1835

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API