Legal Opinion
Puchalski v. NJ State Parole Board
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided January 29, 1969PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
104 N.J. Super. 294 (1969)
250 A.2d 19
ANTHONY M. PUCHALSKI, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
NEW JERSEY STATE PAROLE BOARD, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued January 13, 1969.
Decided January 29, 1969.
Before Judges GAULKIN, COLLESTER and LABRECQUE.
Mr. Henry A. Hill, Jr. argued the cause for appellant.
Mr. Eugene T. Urbaniak, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent (Mr. Arthur J. Sills, Attorney General, attorney).
GAULKIN, S.J.A.D.
This case raises the question whether Puchalski was entitled to the assignment of counsel at public expense to assist…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Griffin v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Douglas v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Townsend v. BurkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Mempa v. RhaySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Harper v. Virginia Board of ElectionsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Warren v. Parole BoardMichigan Court of Appeals · 1970
- O'NEAL v. NJ State Parole BoardNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977
- Monks v. NJ State Parole BoardSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1971
- ABDUL-MALIK MUHAMMAD VS. NEW JERSEY STATE PAROLE BOARD (NEW JERSEY STATE PAROLE BOARD)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2019
- ANTOINE ANDERSON VS. NEW JERSEY STATE PAROLE BOARD (NEW JERSEY STATE PAROLE BOARD)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2020
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.