Legal Opinion

Shinn v. Bodine

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 21, 1869No. 322PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Certificate from the Court of Nisi Prius, No. 322, to January Term 1866. This was an action of assumpsit, brought to January Term 1866, by Erank L. Bodine and J. Minor Bodine, trading as E. & J. Bodine, against Charles PI. Shinn and William O. Shinn, trading as Charles II. Shinn & Son. The cause of action alleged in the plaintiffs’ declaration was that the defendants had refused to deliver 800 tons of coal, as they had contracted to do.

Read the full summary

Certificate from the Court of Nisi Prius, No. 322, to January Term 1866. This was an action of assumpsit, brought to January Term 1866, by Erank L. Bodine and J. Minor Bodine, trading as E. & J. Bodine, against Charles PI. Shinn and William O. Shinn, trading as Charles II. Shinn & Son. The cause of action alleged in the plaintiffs’ declaration was that the defendants had refused to deliver 800 tons of coal, as they had contracted to do. The contract was contained in the following letter:— “ 128 So. Front St., July 31st 1865. “ Messrs. C. H. Shinn & Co. “Gentlemen — We accept your offer for…

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered, by

Agnew, J.

— The entirety of a contract depends upon the inten-' tion of the parties and not on the divisibility of the subject. The severable nature of the latter may often assist in determining the intention, but will not overcome the intent to make an entire contract, when that is shown. Nor will the mode of measuring the price, as by the bushel, ton or pound, change the effect of the agreement when it is entire. If a party should agree to deliver one bullock, at a certain price per pound, and on a certain day, no one would doubt the entirety of the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Harris v. LiggetSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1841

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Thorpe v. SchoenbrunSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  2. Orenstein v. KahnSupreme Court of Delaware · 1922
  3. Easton v. JonesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1899
  4. Producers Coke Co. v. HillmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1914
  5. Bamberger Bros. v. BurrowsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1910

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API