Legal Opinion

Paredes v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 4, 2012PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

“It is well-settled that schools have a duty to adequately supervise their students, and will be held liable for foreseeable injuries proximately related to the absence of adequate supervision” (Brandy B. v Eden Cent. School Dist., 15 NY3d 297, 302 [2010] [internal quotation marks omitted]). “[A] teacher owes it to his [or her] charges to exercise such care of them as a parent of ordinary prudence would observe in comparable circumstances” (Mirand v City of New York, 84 NY2d 44, 49 [1994] [internal quotation marks omitted]).

Summary judgment should have been granted in this action where the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Mirand v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
  2. Brandy B. v. Eden Central School DistrictNew York Court of Appeals · 2010
  3. Summer H. v. New York City Department of EducationNew York Court of Appeals · 2012
  4. Hunter v. New York City Department of EducationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Goldschmidt v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  2. Chung v. New York City Board of EducationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
  3. Luis S. v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API