Legal Opinion

Gray v. Messier

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided February 10, 1992PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ROBERTS, Justice.

William V. Gray, represented by the Attorney General, appeals from the dismissal by the Superior Court (Kennebec County, Alexander, J.) of his petition for support filed pursuant to the Uniform Reciprocal Enforcement of Support Act (URESA). 19 M.R.S.A. §§ 331-420 (1981 & Supp. 1991). Because the court’s conclusion that URESA procedures are not available to Gray is erroneous, we vacate the dismissal.

*1156Gray and Michelle A. Messier were divorced in the District Court (Rockland, Pease, J.) in 1985. The divorce judgment provided that the parties share parental rights and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Mathieu v. Commissioner of Human ServicesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1989

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Taravella v. StanleyConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API