Legal Opinion · Dissent

Sears Roebuck & Co. v. Employers Mutual Liability Insurance Co. of Wisconsin

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided May 10, 1972No. 53267Published

1Dissent

Mr. PRESIDING JUSTICE DIERINGER

dissenting:

I respectfully dissent to the holding pertaining to the defendant, Kamin Die Casting & Manufacturing Company, a corporation. I agree the defendant, Employers Mutual Liability Insurance Company of Wisconsin, a corporation, was properly dismissed.

As to Kamin, the record shows a written tender was made to Kamin by Sears Roebuck & Company and Zurich Insurance Company, its insurer, and to Employers Mutual Liability Insurance Company of Wisconsin, insurer of Kamin, to take over the defense of Sears in the Alabama case. Kamin s answer to the complaint admits…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Suvada v. White Motor Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Washington Gas Light Co. v. District of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  3. Robbins v. Chicago CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1867
  4. Chicago City v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1863
  5. Drennan v. BunnIllinois Supreme Court · 1888

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API