Moss v. Maryland
District Court, D. Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
WATKINS, District Judge.
Initially petitioner Moss filed in this court a petition for the issuance of a writ of habeas corpus alleging that (1) he was being held “in custodia legis”, that (2) he had fully and completely exhausted all available state remedies and that (3) he was being placed in double jeopardy by certain state court appellate proceedings pending against him contrary to the dictates of the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States. Thereafter, petitioner Siskos filed in this court a petition for the issuance of a writ of habeas corpus making allegations identical…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Hill v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Jones v. CunninghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- England v. Louisiana State Board of Medical ExaminersSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Spector Motor Service, Inc. v. McLaughlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Harrison v. National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored PeopleSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hensley v. Municipal Court, San Jose-Milpitas Judicial Dist., Santa Clara Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Hensley v. Municipal Court, San Jose-Milpitas Judicial Dist., Santa Clara Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973