Legal Opinion

Lesnick v. Pratt

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided February 6, 1951No. 220Published

1Opinion of the Court

Cleary, j.

This is an action of tort for fraud and deceit involving the sale of an automobile to the plaintiffs by the defendant. The defendant pleaded infancy. Trial was by the court with judgment for the plaintiffs. Both parties excepted.

The findings of fact show that at the time of the sale on January 20, 1949, the defendant falsely and.fraudulently represented that the automobile was fully paid for and was free of liens and encumbrances and on September 13, 1949, the plaintiffs were obliged to pay the balance owing on a conditional sale contract which the defendant had signed when he…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. TUCKER v. MorelandSupreme Court of the United States · 1836
  2. Johnson v. Hardware Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1938
  3. Welch v. KingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
  4. Smith v. Badlam and AndersonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1940
  5. McCutcheon v. LeonardSupreme Court of Vermont · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API