Legal Opinion

Coats v. Hord

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 4, 1915No. Civ. No. 1729PublishedCited by 2 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco, and from an order denying a new trial. William M. Conley, Judge presiding. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtRichards, J.

This is an action brought for the rescission of a contract for the exchange of a stallion for a jack mule, the plaintiff averring that the latter animal proved worthless for the purpose for which he acquired it. The cause was tried upon the issues presented by the pleadings. The court found that the exchange had been brought about through certain statements made by the defendant which amounted to an express warranty of the foal-producing qualities of the mule, and which had proven untrue. It further found that the stallion was of the value of five hundred dollars, and the court thereupon…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Luitweiler Pumping Engine Co. v. Ukiah Water & Improvement Co.California Court of Appeal · 1911
  2. McLennan v. OhmenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Barrios v. Pacific States Trading Co.California Court of Appeal · 1919
  2. Morris v. Fiat Motor Sales Co.California Court of Appeal · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API