Florida Bar v. Bauman
Supreme Court of Florida
1Per curiam
This disciplinary proceeding is before us on complaint of The Florida Bar and the uncontested report of the referee. We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 15, Fla. Const.
The Florida Bar charged respondent with engaging in unethical conduct, specifically, violation of article XI, Rule 11.02(3)(a), of the Integration Rule of the Florida Bar (commission of an act contrary to honesty, justice, and good morals), and Disciplinary Rule 1-102(A)(6) (conduct that adversely reflects on his fitness to practice law).
Respondent entered into a stipulation for a consent judgment based on the following admitted…
2Cited by1 opinion
- The Florida Bar v. BaumanSupreme Court of Florida · 1990