Legal Opinion

State v. Shaw

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided September 29, 1997No. 2720PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GOOLSBY, Judge.

The single issue presented in this criminal case is whether evidence of a prior conviction for shoplifting may be used under Rule 609(a)(2), SCRE 1 to impeach the credibility of a defendant. We hold it may be so used and affirm. 2

Bernard Shaw was convicted of possession with intent to distribute crack cocaine and possession with intent to distribute crack cocaine within one-half mile of a school. The trial judge sentenced him to seven years imprisonment.

Shaw testified in his own defense at trial, affirmatively disclosing he had been convicted of third degree burglary in 1991,…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. People v. SpatesIllinois Supreme Court · 1979
  2. E. Scott McHenry v. Samuel ChadwickCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
  3. United States v. Dr. Luther Lewis Ashley, Jr., and John Franklin RoperCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
  4. United States v. Danny Sellers and Terry RoachCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
  5. Commonwealth v. KyleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
  2. Colorado v. SegoviaSupreme Court of Colorado · 2008
  3. State v. Al-AminCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2003
  4. State v. ColfCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1998
  5. Clark v. CantrellCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1998

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API