Legal Opinion

State, Ex Rel. Pfeifer v. Stoneking

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided March 13, 1946No. 668PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPutnam, J.

This is an action in mandamus, originating in this court, in which the relator, an elector and member of the democratic party and a resident of ward three of the city of Zanesville, seeks a writ compelling .the respondents, the members of the board of elections of Muskingum county, to cause his name to he printed on the ballot to be voted on at the primary election on May 7, 1946, as a candidate for county central committeeman of the democratic party of Muskingum county from ward three of the city of Zanesville. The action involves a factional fight in that party for committee control in the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. BallinSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Heiskell v. Mayor & City CouncilCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1886
  3. Fifty West Broad Street v. PoulsonOhio Court of Appeals · 1944
  4. State Ex Rel. Humker v. HummelOhio Supreme Court · 1944

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State, Ex Rel. McCurdy v. DemaioribusOhio Court of Appeals · 1967
  2. Lee v. NielsenSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1978
  3. Ohio House Republican Alliance v. StephensOhio Court of Appeals · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API