Legal Opinion

Parrinello v. Hicks

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided June 26, 1944Published

1Opinion of the CourtHammeb, J.

Plaintiffs’ complaint as limited by their bill of particulars alleges that in August, September and October, 1940, defendant wrongfully and without exercising due care, in violation of section 22 of the New York Building Code, excavated the rock and dirt, in depth ten feet, on his land, which adjoins plaintiffs’ land in the rear, and by reason thereof plaintiffs lost their retaining wall, trees, shrubs, grass, dirt and top soil, to their damage in the sum of $800. At the time of alleged excavation the property now owned by plaintiffs was owned by a predecessor in title. On the trial…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Booth v. . R., W. O.T.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1893
  2. Jubilee Yacht Club v. Gulf Refining Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923
  3. Bergen v. Morton Amusement Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917
  4. Bartsch v. RagonettiNew York Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Bartsch v. RagonetteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1925

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API