Legal Opinion

State v. . Smith

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 5, 1887PublishedCited by 9 opinions

CRIMINAL action, tried before Merrimon, Judge, at July Term, 1887, of Wake Superior Court. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtMerrimon, J.

The defendant was held to answer criminally, before a justice of the peace, for having failed to do service on a public road, as he was bound to do, under a State warrant, the material charging part of which is in these words: “That Rufus Smith failed to work the road on the 16th day of September, 1886, at and in the county aforesaid, as a hand, in Swift Creek township, on the old Haywood road, leading from Raleigh to Haywood, for one half day, against the peace and dignity of the State.”

He was convicted and appealed to the Superior Court, and was there again convicted, and having asssigned…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. . VaughanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1884

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Alexander v. LindseySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  2. State v. . BakerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
  3. State v. . PoolSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
  4. State v. . GreenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1909
  5. State v. GreenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1909

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API