Legal Opinion

Ramroop v. Flexo-Craft Printing, Inc.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided June 26, 2008PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Jones, J.

The question before us is whether claimant may recover “additional compensation” under Workers’ Compensation Law § 15 (3) (v). We conclude that he may not.1

On March 28, 1995, claimant, then employed and working as a printer for respondent Flexo-Craft Printing, Inc., sustained a severe crush injury involving four fingers when he caught his right hand in a printing press.2 After claimant’s March 8, 1996 workers’ compensation hearing (where his claim for a compensable injury to the right hand was established), the Workers’ *165Compensation Board awarded claimant…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Majewski v. Broadalbin-Perth Central School DistrictNew York Court of Appeals · 1998
  2. Balbuena v. IDR REALTY LLCNew York Court of Appeals · 2006
  3. LaCroix v. Syracuse Executive Air Service, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2007
  4. Claim of Testa v. Sorrento Restaurant, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1960

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Matter of Mancini v. Office of Children & Family Servs.New York Court of Appeals · 2018
  2. Claim of Amoah v. Mallah Management, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  3. New York Hospital Medical Center v. Microtech Contracting Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 2014
  4. People v. Pharmacia Corp.New York Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Pesca v. Barbera Homes, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 2012

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API