Legal Opinion
Bannum, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided March 12, 2014No. 1:14-cv-00140PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION 2
WILLIAMS, Judge.
This post-award bid protest comes before the Court on Plaintiff Bannum, Inc.’s (“Ban- num”) motion for a preliminary injunction. 3 Bannum challenges the terms of a solicitation issued by the United States Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Prisons (“BOP”) and BOP’s award of a contract to Intervenor Dismas Charities, Inc. (“Dismas”). Bannum argues that the solicitation was defective because BOP required compliance with the Prison Rape Elimination Act of 2003 (“PREA”) without giving guidance…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Karen S. Reynolds v. Army and Air Force Exchange ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Information Technology & Applications Corporation v. United States, and Rs Information Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Bannum, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
- Communication Construction Services, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
- Northeast Construction, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
- Cgi Federal Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
- Fredericks v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.