Legal Opinion

Perlman v. Stellwagen

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 15, 1921PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Action to remove an encroachment.

1Opinion of the CourtMullan, J.

I find that the front wall of the building encroaches two inches upon the street, the position fixed by the surveyors called by the plaintiff; that whatever excuse a surveyor may have had for locating the line at another point the mathematical fact is controlling, and that no principle of estoppel, whether by reason of incorrect surveying for the city in street-opening proceedings or otherwise, is applicable. Furthermore, I am of the opinion that even if any of the locations so very ably contended for by defendant’s counsel in his excellent argument upon that head were to be adopted the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ackerman v. . TrueNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
  2. Empire Realty Corp. v. SayreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905
  3. Broadbelt v. LoewNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
  4. Acme Realty Co. v. SchinasiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1913

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Mertens v. BerendsenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Mahaney v. 580 Madison Ave., Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Brockton Associates, Inc. v. WeinbaumNew York Supreme Court · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API