Legal Opinion

Rancourt v. Magill

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided August 16, 2011PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

To gain a position on the primary election ballot as a candidate for the nomination of the Republican Party as its candidate for the public office of Town Clerk of the Town of Beekman, Melinda Magill was required to obtain 145 valid signatures on her designating petition, representing 5% of the enrolled Republican Party voters in the Town of Beekman (see Election Law § 6-136 [2]). The subscribing witnesses for Magill’s designating petition attested that they obtained a total of 308 signatures. However, a review of the designating petition reveals that the subscribing witness statements…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Fromson v. LefeverAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  2. Staber v. FidlerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  3. Matter of Hochberg v. D'ApiceNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. Fox v. Westchester County Board of ElectionsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  5. Brown v. SachsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. VanSavage v. JonesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  2. Rancourt v. KennedyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  3. MatterofVanSavagevJonesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  4. VanSavage v. JonesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API