Legal Opinion

In re the Accounting of Drake

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided November 21, 1949Published

1Opinion of the Court

Witmer, S.

Upon this judicial settlement proceeding respondent, Loretta Y. Smithlin, claims that by virtue of paragraph “ Second ” of the will she is entitled to share equally in the proceeds of a certain life insurance policy paid to testator’s estate in the sum of $2,749.10. It is the petitioner’s view that such proceeds pass under the residuary clause, to writ, paragraph “ Ninth ”, in which Dorothy Edwards Drake, wife of petitioner, is named as sole beneficiary. After making the usual provision in the first paragraph for the payment of debts and funeral expenses, the testator provided:…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re the Will of HindsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1946
  2. In Re the Will of HindsNew York Court of Appeals · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API