Legal Opinion

Hickey v. Waldman

Massachusetts Superior Court

Decided January 18, 2011No. 06659Published

1Opinion of the Court

Billings, Thomas P., J.

The plaintiff appeals the Division of Medical Assistance’s (herein, “MassHealth’s”) handling of her requests for reimbursement for two substances, curcumin and acidophilus capsules, both of which she takes on her doctors’ recommendation. Curcumin was denied on the merits; acidophilus for want of a properly documented application. Each decision was reviewed and affirmed by a hearing officer of the Office of Medicaid. The plaintiff has appealed the Hearing Officer’s decision to this Court under G.L.c. 30A, §14.

For the reasons that follow, both decisions are AFFIRMED, with…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Beal v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Seagram Distillers Co. v. Alcoholic Beverages Control CommissionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1988
  3. Weaver v. ReagenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1989
  4. Haley v. Commissioner of Public WelfareMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
  5. Washington Legal Foundation v. HenneyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2000

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API