Legal Opinion

Unified School District No. 255 v. Unified School District No. 254

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 6, 1969No. 45,487PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Kaul, J.:

This is an action by plaintiff, Unified School District No. 255, to recover equitable payment from defendant, Unified School District No. 254, under the provisions of K. S. A. 1965 Supp. 72-6776 [now K. S.A. 1968 Supp.]. The action stems from the division and disorganization of Rural High School District No. 7, Barber County, by the unification of Barber County on July 1, 1966, into two unified districts which are the parties to this action. There were some deviations from the county line between Barber and Pratt counties which are immaterial…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. School District v. State Board of EducationMichigan Supreme Court · 1962
  2. State Ex Rel. Ferguson v. City of PittsburgSupreme Court of Kansas · 1961
  3. Stady v. Texas Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1939
  4. Williams v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Kansas · 1967
  5. Hultz v. TaylorSupreme Court of Kansas · 1947

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Kansas City Millwright Co., Inc. v. KalbSupreme Court of Kansas · 1977
  2. Unified School District No. 229 v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 1994
  3. Lines v. City of TopekaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1978
  4. J. G. Masonry, Inc. v. Department of RevenueSupreme Court of Kansas · 1984
  5. Unified School District No. 380 v. McMillenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1993

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API