Legal Opinion

Pilkington v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Decided March 16, 1971No. 6 Div. 144PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CATES, Judge.

First degree murder: electrocution.

Issue was framed on a plea of not guilty and one of not guilty by reason of insanity. By a specific provision of Code 1940, T. 15, § 422 the burden of proving insanity is cast upon the accused.

I

After the defense rested the State called a rebuttal witness. Over objection the State established by her that about two months before the homicide in question the defendant committed an assault on her with intent to ravish and, on being repulsed, robbed her of her pocket book.

At page 285 of the record we find the following colloquy after objection was…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Witherspoon v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Bumper v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Boulden v. HolmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Nichols v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1964
  5. Barbour v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1954

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Ex Parte VaughnSupreme Court of Alabama · 2002
  2. Dealto v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1995
  3. Moore v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2003
  4. Christian v. City of TuscaloosaCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1974
  5. Ex Parte MillerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1984

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API