S.J.F. v. R.C.W.
North Dakota Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
GLASER, Chief Judge.
[¶ 1] This is an appeal from judgment in a paternity/ehild-support bench trial. Neither party requested genetic testing. The trial court did not determine whether the defendant was or was not the father. Instead, the trial court decided that “the facts presented at trial are insufficient to support a finding that [R.C.W.] is the natural father of [S.J.F.].” The court ordered the case dismissed with prejudice. We remand to the trial court for preparation of more explicit findings.
[¶ 2] In its memorandum of decision denying a motion for new trial or motion to amend findings,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Mansukhani v. PailingNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
- Federal Land Bank of St. Paul v. LillehaugenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
- Stark County Social Service Board v. R.S.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
3Cited by3 opinions
- S.J.F. v. R.C.W.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
- In Interest of SjfNorth Dakota Court of Appeals · 1998
- In Re SJFNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000