Legal Opinion · Dissent

Andujar-Ruiz v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 16, 2016No. 2D15-5304Published

1DissentCrenshaw, Judge

Because I cannot conclude that the trial court’s instruction on Andujar-Ruiz’s duty to retreat constituted fundamental error under these facts, I must respectfully dissent.

The majority asserts that the instructions constitute fundamental error because they deprived Andujar-Ruiz of his sole defense at trial. In my view, a complete fundamental error analysis leads to the conclusion that the jury instructions did not constitute fundamental error in this case. “Where the challenged jury instruction involves an affirmative defense, as opposed to an element of the crime, fundamental error only…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Martinez v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2008
  2. Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1988
  3. Garrett v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
  4. Smith v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
  5. John Thomas Dorsey v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API